Institute Closed for Winter Break
-
December 25, 2018 - January 1, 2019
12:05 am - 11:55 pm
Thursday, March 28, 2019
8:00 – 10:00 pm
Presenter: Carla Neely, Ph.D.
The use of the analyst as a developmental object can occur in all analyses but has been linked historically to technique applicable primarily to developmental pathology. It has also suffered by its confusion with the concept “corrective emotional experience.” This paper attempts to correct that confusion as well as to clarify the mechanisms by which the analyst as developmental object contributes to structural change. To highlight the unique roles of the developmental object in therapeutic action, clinical material is presented contrasting the use of the analyst as a developmental object with that of the analyst as transference object. To achieve this goal, this paper draws on psychoanalytic theorists’ study of the concept and illustrative clinical examples.
2 CME/CE credits offered.
Dr. Carla Neely is a child and adolescent analyst who trained at the Hampstead Therapy Clinic in London. She completed her adult psychoanalytic training at the Denver Institute of Psychoanalysis. Prior to that, she graduated from Smith College Social Work School and she then went to the Lund University in Sweden where she obtained her Ph.D. She is on the faculty of the University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, the Denver Institute for Psychoanalysis, the Washington School of Psychiatry and the Washington Baltimore Psychoanalytic Institute. She is past President, past Secretary, and past Councilor of the Association for Child Psychoanalysis. Her areas of publications and presentations are creativity, sublimation, developmental disharmony, developmental object, therapeutic action, and the nature of working through.
Educational Objectives: Upon completion of this activity, participants will be able to:
Wednesday, December 5, 2018
8:00 – 10:00 pm
Presenter: Arnold Richards, M.D.
This paper proposes that wishes for longevity and immortality should be added to Freud’s list of wish fulfillment (sexual and aggressive) in dreams. The author provides examples of his own dreams to support his thesis. The paper also maintains that the distinction between wish fulfillment and traumatic dreams is not as absolute as Freud maintains – traumatic dreams may also be wish fulfilling. The paper discusses how the child knowledge of death develops from early life on. The fear of immortality as well as the wish for immortality is considered.
No CME/CE credits offered.
Thursday, December 6, 2018
8:00 pm
Presenter: Christine Anzieu-Premmereur, M.D., Ph.D.
This presentation discusses the treatment of a disturbed baby encapsulated in an autistic relationship with a severely depressed mother. This mother-baby dyad was unable to develop a communicative relationship with potentially catastrophic effects for the baby’s future mental health.
The lack of synchrony between the baby’s needs and feelings and the mother had blocked the baby’s capacity to develop an integrated self capable of sustaining the Body Ego. The young child’s long treatment demonstrates how bodily experiences and affects are present from the beginning of life as the core of the developing self and can be evaluated and interpreted by the analyst. The child’s early mental life initially creates the first representations of the self in relationship with the object. Eventually, through bodily sensations linked with emotions and memories of pleasurable moments, the baby’s capacity to integrate these representations enriches the process of symbolization.
2 CME/ CE credits offered.
Christine Anzieu-Premmereur is a psychiatrist and psychoanalyst in NYC who works in private practice with adults and children, parents and their babies. A member of the Société Psychanalytique de Paris, she is on the faculty of the Columbia Psychoanalytic Center for Training and Research, where she directs the Parent-Infant Psychotherapy Training Program; she is Assistant Clinical Professor in Psychiatry at Columbia University. She is a member of the New York Psychoanalytic Society & Institute, and she chairs the discussion group on Parent-Infant Programs at Psychoanalytic Institutes at the American Psychoanalytic Association meetings.
She recently published “The Process of Representation in Early Childhood,” and “Attacks on Linking in Parents of Young Disturbed Children.” In French she has co-authored books on play in child psychotherapy and on psychoanalytic interventions with parents and babies. She co-edited with Vaia Tsolas in October 2017 “A Psychoanalytic Exploration of the Body in Today’s Psychoanalysis.”
Educational Objectives: Upon completion of this activity, participants will be able to:
Wednesday, November 7, 2018
8:00 pm
Presenter: Paul Schwaber, Ph.D.
Looking closely at Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet and King Lear, and guided by both Aristotle and Freud, Dr. Schwaber will explore the appeal of tragedy as a literary form, the ways verbal art imitates significant human action and the illuminating experience it enables. An earlier version of the speaker’s comments on Romeo and Juliet appeared in “For Better and for Worst: Romeo and Juliet” in The Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 61:294-307.
No CME/CE credits offered.
Paul Schwaber is Professor of Letters Emeritus at Wesleyan University and a practicing psychoanalyst. For many years, he was Director of the College of Letters, Wesleyan’s undergraduate major in Western literature, philosophy and history. He has published extensively on the relation between imaginative literature and psychoanalysis.